Post-mastectomy reconstruction: a comparative analysis on psychosocial and psychopathological outcomes☆
Received 30 November 2005; accepted 20 June 2006. published online 05 September 2006.
Summary
Although multiple benefits have been reported from post-mastectomy reconstruction and particularly from an immediate procedure, limited psychiatric evaluation has been published. The present study was planned to evaluate the psychosocial and psychopathological outcome in patients who had undergone post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. We also investigated if any psychopathological condition could significantly affect the benefits of the reconstructive procedure. We compared 33 breast-reconstructed patients with 33 patients with mastectomy alone and 33 healthy women. All women underwent a psychiatric interview with four questionnaire-based scales (SASS, QL-index, HAM-A, HAM-D) to assess social adaptation, quality of life, anxiety and depression. A 4-point scale evaluated reconstructed patients' satisfaction. After a year, there was no statistical difference in social, sexual relationships and quality of life among reconstructed patients and healthy women. Regarding anxiety, no statistical difference was found between reconstructed and mastectomy groups. Statistically different lower depression levels in the healthy group and higher levels in the mastectomy group were found. Depression in the reconstructed group decreased compared to the mastectomy group. Differences between timing and reconstructive techniques were not statistically validated. Eight patients were dissatisfied (24.2%). Immediate reconstructed patients who had pre-existing major depressive disorder were dissatisfied. Breast-reconstructed patients' quality of life, social and sexual relationships are not significantly different to those of healthy women. Anxiety does not decrease. Timing and techniques do not seem to influence, significantly, outcome and satisfaction. Pre-existing diagnosis of major depressive disorder may be a contraindication to immediate breast reconstruction.
aDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
bDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
Corresponding author. Dr Andrea Figus, Via Pasteur 1, Cagliari, 09126, Sardinia, Italy. Tel.: +39 3355874800; fax: +39 06491525.
☆ Presented in part at the VIIIth Congress of Italian and American Plastic Surgeons, Ischia, Italy, 6–8 June 2002 and at the British Association of Plastic Surgeons Summer Meeting, Newport, South Wales, UK, 2–4 July 2003.