Journal Home
Search for

Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 65-70 (January 2008)


View previous. 10 of 23 View next.

Marjolin's ulcer revisited – basal cell carcinoma arising from grenade fragments? Case report and review of the literature

Ulrich M. RiegeraCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Daniel F. Kalbermattena, Reto Wettsteina, Ilonka Heiderb, Martin Hauga, Gerhard Pierera

Received 18 February 2006; accepted 30 May 2006. published online 01 September 2006.

Summary 

Background

Marjolin's ulcer is a rare and often aggressive cutaneous malignancy arising in previously traumatized or chronically inflamed skin.

Method

Case report: A 79-year-old World War II veteran developed basal cell carcinoma (BCC) at the site of a war wound. The tumour developed in relation to several metal grenade fragments. With a disease-free interval of 61 years between injury and onset of complications the patient had one of the longest latency periods of tumour development described so far.

Results

Review of the literature reveals only five cases of relation between grenade fragments and malignancy formation. Presence of foreign bodies has been described as possible aetiology for malignancy development. Explosives and additives contain several mutagenic and tumourigenic substances.

We hypothesize a causal connection between the grenade fragments and the development of BCC. Considering the long period of latency between injury and tumour development we suggest grenade injury with left fragments in soft tissue to be a new origin of Marjolin's ulcer.

Article Outline

Summary

Case report

Review of literature

Discussion

Acknowledgment

References

Copyright

The term ‘Marjolin's ulcer’ has been generally accepted to refer to long-term malignant complications in scars resulting from burns.1 The French surgeon Jean-Nicholas Marjolin demonstrated the cellular changes of the ulcerated lesions in scarred tissue in 1828. Subsequently the entity was described by Smith more in detail.2

A literature review reveals that these skin tumours also occur on various forms of scars in general, chronic ulcerations, inflammations and fistulas after a long period of latency.3, 4 Malignant transformation takes approximately 35 years on average,3, 5 although there are reported cases of Marjolin's ulcer occurring a few months after the initial injury.1, 4, 6

The incidence of malignant skin tumours in scarred tissues is 0.1–2.5%. Half of the cases (49%) are due to burn scars. However, among the reported rare causes of Marjolin's ulcer are stasis ulcers, osteomyelitic sinuses, hidradenitis suppurativa, vesico-vaginal fistulas, amputation stumps, lupus vulgaris, infections (i.e. syphilis, lymphogranuloma venereum and leishmaniasis)7 and physical and chemical frostbites.8, 9

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the commonest histological type of Marjolin's ulcer, but basal call carcinoma (BCC) has been reported as well.10

The pathogenesis of Marjolin's ulcer is controversial.1, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 On a molecular level, aberrant activation of the so-called SHH-pathway seems to play a crucial role in BCC development. However, other tumour suppressor and DNA repair gene mutations are also discussed.16

Atrophic or unstable scars in general tend to develop into cancer.17 Here we report on a BCC arising from a scar, that a World War II veteran had sustained 60 years before from hand grenade fragments. We review similar cases in the literature and further discuss probable factors that may induce or facilitate malignant degeneration of such scars.

Case report 

return to Article Outline

A 79-year-old white male patient presented to our clinic in March 2004 with chronic ulceration over the medial aspect of his left calf. Interview with the patient revealed that he had sustained an injury from grenade fragments in his left calf on D-Day 1944 during World War II. He stated that initially the wound was healing poorly due to an infection. One operation for debridement was necessary back in 1944 and within several weeks after that wound closure was achieved. For the following 56 years the patient had no further problems with his left calf. However, four years prior to presentation to our clinic he had noticed a small ulceration with little discharge over the medial aspect of his left calf. On a couple of occasions he had seen different practitioners and was treated for venous disease.

On presentation we noted an ulcer, 4cm×2cm in size (Fig. 1), with little discharge. As an initial clinical diagnosis the lesion mimicked an irritative ulceration due to a foreign body reaction. On dermatoscopic examination a neoplastic component could not be ruled out and a skin biopsy showed that the lesion was BCC (Fig. 2). Radiography of the lower leg revealed that some of the grenade fragments were still in situ (Fig. 3).


View full-size image.

Figure 1 Clinical presentation of a 79-year-old patient with chronic ulceration over his left calf.



View full-size image.

Figure 2 The BCC reveals acanthotic broadened epidermis (left side). Basalioma consisting of basophilic cell threads with palisaded tumour cells on the right margin (right side). The dermal connective tissue is scarred (magnification 25×).



View full-size image.

Figure 3 X-ray views oft left lower leg; (a) lateral view; (b) anterior–posterior view. Note: grenade fragments (pointing arrows) still in situ in the left calf.


Tumour resection was carried out with 2cm margins and the defect was covered with a split skin graft. The pathological evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma with a completely excised tumour. The post-operative course was uneventful with good wound healing.

Review of literature 

return to Article Outline

A review of the literature reveals five published cases of grenade fragments left in situ in various parts of the human body associated with development of malignancies (Table 1).18, 19, 20, 21, 22 The association of grenade fragments with development of different kinds of lung cancer has been described in three cases.18, 19, 21 Tolle20 has reported development of basal cell carcinoma of the ethmoid associated with a grenade splinter injury. An Australian group has described the development of angiosarcoma 63 years after an injury to the right axilla from a German stick grenade during World War I. Development of the tumour was seen in relation to several metal grenade fragments which were in proximity as well as within the tumour mass.22

Table 1.

Type of neoplasms following grenade fragment injuries, synopsis of authors, years of publication, journals and body location

AuthorYearJournalType of neoplasmLocation in body
Schutz and Stein181956ThoraxchirurgieLung carcinomaLung
Peter191966Zentralbl Allg PatholLung carcinomaLung
Tolle201967HNOBasal cell carcinomaEthmoid
Stambolis et al.211982Med WeltLung-scar cancerLung
Hayman and Huygens221983J Clin PatholAngiosarcomaRight axilla

Tumourigenesis due to a foreign body has been extensively studied in animals and has been reviewed by Brand et al.23 It has been shown that physical presence of implants alone can be responsible for tumourigenesis,23 and even non-reactive materials such as gold, platinum or stainless steel were proven to be tumourigenic in mice or rats provided that the surfaces were intact and continuous. When these surfaces were roughened or softened the tumour incidence decreased markedly.22

In humans foreign body induced tumours are very rare. When looking at tumours induced by foreign bodies not related to warfare, Fehrenbacher et al.24 reported an angiosarcoma of the aorta, arising near a Dacron aortic graft 12 years after insertion.

Analysis of the current literature with focus on influence of warfare on development of skin cancers and soft tissue sarcoma reveals several possible causes in addition to grenade fragments (Table 2).20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 BCC, squamous cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, Bowen's disease and soft tissue sarcoma have all been shown in causal connection with nuclear testing, atomic bombing and radiation in general.25, 26, 27, 30, 32, 33 Association of burns with development of Marjolin's ulcer has already been mentioned.28 Physical injury to skin in general, being either sharp or blunt, has been associated with development of BCC.29, 31

Table 2.

Development of different types of skin malignancies after warfare, authors, years of publication, journals and suspected aetiology

Type of malignancyAuthorsYearJournalAetiology
MalignantMuirhead et al.252004J Radiol ProtNuclear testing
MelanomaFink and Bates262005Radiat ResAtomic bombing
Kishikawa et al.272005Int J CancerAtomic bombing
Kowal-Vern and Criswell282005BurnsBurn
Basal cellTolle201967HNOGrenade fragments
CarcinomaNoodleman and Pollack291986J Dermatol Surg OncolBurn, sharp and blunt trauma
Nelson and Randle302003Dermatol SurgNuclear testing
Ozyazgan and Kontas312004Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand SurgPhysical skin injury
Cognetta et al.322005J Am Acad DermatolCathode ray oscilloscope exposure World War II
Kishikawa et al.272005Int J CancerAtomic bombing
Kowal-Vern and Criswell282005BurnsBurn
Bauer et al.332005Radiat ResNuclear testing
SquamousMuirhead et al.252004J Radiol ProtNuclear testing
CellKishikawa et al.272005Int J CancerAtomic bombing
CarcinomaKowal-Vern and Criswell282005BurnsBurn
Bauer et al.332005Radiat ResNuclear testing
Bowen's diseaseKishikawa et al.272005Int J CancerAtomic bombing
Soft tissueKowal-Vern and Criswell282005BurnsBurn injuries
SarcomaMuirhead et al.252004J Radiol ProtNuclear testing
Kishikawa et al.272005Int J CancerAtomic bombing
Bauer et al.332005Radiat ResNuclear testing

Discussion 

return to Article Outline

BCC is the most common cancer in humans.34 Exposure to ultra-violet (UV) radiation from sunlight is thought to be a common aetiologic risk factor for BCC as well as other skin malignancies. Although uncommon, an association between skin trauma, a chronic and inflammatory process, and scar formation has been suggested as playing a role in some skin cancer pathogenesis.35 Marjolin's ulcer is described as squamous cell carcinoma and rarely as BCC arising in areas of chronically non-healing wounds.3, 4 These lesions are frequently overlooked and often inadequately treated, as in the case described, when the patient was treated with ointments for four years with no biopsies taken.

Short-term effects from hand grenade injuries have been evaluated in detail36 and biophysics and patho-physiology37 have been studied. Reports of long-term effects of grenade fragments include a large bowel perforation 16 years after injury,38 development of a psoas muscle abscess,38 a brain abcess 47 years after head injury related to metal fragments39 and biliary obstruction secondary to a shrapnel 44 years after injury40 has been reported as well.

Small fragment wounds have been studied in an animal model.37 This study concludes that with small fragments in soft tissue, mainly in subcutaneous tissue, surgical exploration, debridement, excision of dead tissue and delayed primary closure may not be the best treatment option as timely use of antibiotics and leaving of the small fragments in situ yields similar wound healing results with so far no disadvantages.37 However, long-term effects of grenade fragments left in subcutaneous tissue have not been studied in humans so far and case reports are rare. We know that hand grenades and explosives in general contain dozens of substances that have possible mutagenic and tumourigenic potential (Table 3).41 It is generally accepted that arsenic can lead to development of BCC with a lag of 30 years after exposure.22 This mutagenic potential in grenade fragment injuries may hardly count in the short term, but in the long term we think that by leaving the grenade fragments in situ, the mutagenic effect of these substances can work on the surrounding soft tissue for the years to come. In this particular case we think that a couple of factors contributed to the development of BCC including an initial burn component from the hot grenade fragments and secondary wound healing after the trauma. The tumour may also have arisen due to a foreign body reaction as described in the aforementioned animal model.23 Considering that the grenade fragment surfaces can be looked on as not intact or not continuous, the animal model allots reduced tumourigenic potential to the grenade fragments. Thus the influence of impurities with tumourigenic and mutagenic potential diffusing from the grenade fragments seems important.

Table 3.

Hazardous potential of explosives, additives to explosives and subsequent products (after Blumes41)

Effect on healthExplosive materialsIgnition materialsAdditives
No toxic effectNitrocellulosis
Detrimental to healtho-, p-NitrophenolPb-trinitroresorcinatePhthalates
Pb-acid, Pb-ipicrate
PoisonousHexogen (RDX), octogen (HMX), 2,4,6-trinitrotoluol, dinitrotoluol, tetryl, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol, picrinacid, 1,4-diaminobezol, p-nitroanilin
Very poisonousNitrogylcerine, hexyl, 1,3,5-trinitrobenzol, glycoldinitrate, 1,3-dinitrobenzol
Neurotoxic Tetrazen
TumourigenicHydrazine, o-toluidine, nitrosamine, 2,4-dinitrotoluol, 2,6-dinitrotoluol, 2-amino-4-nitrotoluol, 2,4-diaminotoluol, 2,4,6-trinitrotoluol N′, N′-diphenylnitrosamin, dioctylphthalate
MutagenicDinitrotoluols, 2,4,6-trinitrotoluol, 1,3- and 1,5-dinitro-naphthaline, 2-amino-4-nitrotoluol, 2,4-dinitroanisol, 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol, p-nitroanilin, o-nitrotoluol

However, the association of the tumour with the fragments may, of course, be purely coincidental, although this would appear unlikely.

In this case we present a 79-year-old patient with Marjolin's ulcer 61 years after a grenade injury with a histopathologic diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. Both, BCC as a form of Marjolin's ulcer and grenade fragments as potential aetiology for cancer are rare characteristics in this case. This observation seems to be important in the context of rising conflicts e.g. in the middle east and the continuing use of explosives, such as land mines.42 Many victims have suffered from metal fragment injuries in the last decades and we need to be aware that there might be also a late component of the injury involving tumour development from lost fragments that needs to be addressed.

Therefore we suggest that removal of projectile fragments from soft tissue should be taken into account even if there may no acute life danger be involved, because in our opinion development of BCC after long lasting war injury should be considered as associated disease.

Acknowledgements 

return to Article Outline

Thanks to Stefan de Maddalena for photographic workup. We thank Katharina Glatz, MD from the Institute for Pathology, Basel University for histologic staining and microphotography.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Thio D, Clarkson JH, Misra A, et al. Malignant change after 18 months in a lower limb ulcer: acute Marjolin's revisited. Br J Plast Surg. 2003 Dec;56(8):825–828. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (368 KB) | CrossRef

2. 2Fleming MD, Hunt JL, Purdue GF, et al. Marjolin's ulcer: a review and reevaluation of a difficult problem. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990;11:460–469. MEDLINE

3. 3Katsas A, Agnantis J, Smyrnis S, et al. Carcinoma on old frostbites. Am J Surg. 1977;133:377–378. MEDLINE | CrossRef

4. 4Eun HC, Kim JA, Lee YS. Squamous cell carcinoma in a frost-bite scar. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1986;11:517–520. MEDLINE | CrossRef

5. 5Hahn SB, Kim DJ, Jeon CH. Clinical study of Marjolin's ulcer. Yonsei Med J. 1990;31:234–241. MEDLINE

6. 6DiPirro E, Conway H. Carcinoma after frostbite: a case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966;38:541–543. MEDLINE | CrossRef

7. 7Gurel MS, Inal L, Ozardali I, et al. Basal cell carcinoma in a leishmanial scar. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005 Jul;30(4):444–445. MEDLINE | CrossRef

8. 8Uysal A, Kocer U, Sungur N, et al. Marjolin's ulcer on frostbite. Burns. 2005 Sep;31(6):792–794. Full Text | Full-Text PDF (189 KB) | CrossRef

9. 9Coburn RJ. Malignant ulcers following trauma. In: Cancer of the Skin. Philadelphia/London/Toronto: AB Saunders Company; 1976;p. 939–949.

10. 10Copcu E, Aktas A, Sisman N, et al. Thirty-one cases of Marjolin's ulcer. Clin Exp Dermatol. Mar 2003;28(2):138–141. MEDLINE | CrossRef

11. 11Neuman Z, Ben-Hur N, Shulman J. Trauma and skin cancer. Implantation of epidermal elements and possible cause. Plast Reonstr Surg. 1963;32:649–656.

12. 12Futrell JW, Myers GHJ. Regional lymphatics and cancer immunity. Ann Surg. 1973;177:1–7. MEDLINE

13. 13Futrell JW, Myers GHJ. The burn scar as an “immunologically privileged site”. Surg Forum. 1972;23:129–131. MEDLINE

14. 14Bostwick J, Pendergrast WJJ, Vasconez LO. Marjolin's ulcer: an immunologically privileged tumor?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57:66–69. MEDLINE

15. 15Castillo JL, Goldsmith HS. Burn scar malignancy in a possible depressed immunologic setting. Surg Forum. 1968;19:511–513. MEDLINE

16. 16Holikova Z, Massi D, Lotti T, et al. Insight into the pathogenesis of sporadic basal cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol. 2004 Dec;43(12):865–869. MEDLINE | CrossRef

17. 17Cavadas PC, Baena-Montilla P, Jorda-Cuevas J, et al. Primary intracranial malignant tumour mistaken for a postburn scalp Marjolin's ulcer. Burns. 1996;22:331–334. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (2694 KB) | CrossRef

18. 18Schutz W, Stein F. Lungenkrebs nach Granatsplitterverletzung (Lung cancer after grenade shell injury), Thoraxchirurgie. 1956;3:429–439.

19. 19Peter L. Lungenkarzinom nach Granatstecksplitterverletzung. Kasuistische Mitteilung (Lung carcinoma following grenade splinter injury. Case reports), Zentralbl Allg Pathol. 1966;109:158–163. MEDLINE

20. 20Tolle D. Basal zellencarcinom des Siebbeins nach Granatsplitterverletzung (Basal-cell carcinoma of the ethmoid bone following grenade-splinter injury), HNO. 1967;15:147–150. MEDLINE

21. 21Stambolis C, Fisher P, Doppl W, et al. Lungennarbenkarzinom nach Granatsplitterverletzung. Klinisch-pathologische und versorgungsrechtliche Aspekte (Lung-scar cancer after grenade fragment injury. Clinco-pathologic and medicolegal aspects), Med Welt. 1982;33:177–181. MEDLINE

22. 22Hayman J, Huygens H. Angiosarcoma developing around a foreign body. J Clin Pathol. 1983;36:515–518. MEDLINE | CrossRef

23. 23Brand KG, Johnson KH, Buoen LC. Foreign body tumorigenesis. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol. 1976;4:353–394. MEDLINE

24. 24Fehrenbacher JW, Bowers W, Strate R, et al. Angiosarcoma of the aorta associated with a Dacron graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 1981;32:297–301. MEDLINE

25. 25Muirhead CR, Kendall GM, Darby SC, et al. Epidemiological studies of UK test veterans: II. Mortality and cancer incidence. J Radiol Prot. Sep 2004;24(3):219–241. MEDLINE | CrossRef

26. 26Flink CA, Bates MN. Melanoma and ionizing radiation: is there a causal relationship?. Radiat Res. 2005 Nov;164(5):701–710. MEDLINE | CrossRef

27. 27Kishikawa M, Koyama K, Iseki M, et al. Histologic characteristics of skin cancer in Hiroshima and Nagasaki: background incidence and radiation effects. Int J Cancer. 2005 Nov 10;117(3):363–369. MEDLINE | CrossRef

28. 28Kowal-Vern A, Criswell BK. Burn scar neoplasmas: a literature review and statistical analysis. Burns. 2005 Jun;31(4):403–413[Epub 2005, Apr 1]. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (353 KB) | CrossRef

29. 29Noodleman FR, Pollack SV. Trauma as a possible etiologic factor in basal cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1986;12:841–846. MEDLINE

30. 30Nelson KL, Randle HW. Skin cancer in an atomic veteran: cause or coincidence?. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Nov;29(11):1100–1104. MEDLINE | CrossRef

31. 31Ozyazgan I, Kontas O. Previous injuries or scars as risk factors for the development of basal cell carcinoma. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38(1):11–15. MEDLINE | CrossRef

32. 32Cognetta AB, Green WH, Marks MM, et al. Basal cell carcinoma and World War II-era cathode ray oscilloscope exposure. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Feb;52(2 Suppl. 1):1–7. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (361 KB) | CrossRef

33. 33Bauer S, Gusev BI, Pivina LM, et al. Radiation exposure due to local fallout from Soviet atmospheric nuclear weapons testing in Kazakhstan: solid cancer mortality in the Semipalatinsk historical cohort, 1960–1999. Radiat Res. 2005 Oct;164(4 Pt. 1):409–419. MEDLINE | CrossRef

34. 34Vogel U, Olsen A, Wallin H, et al. Effect of polymorphisms in XPD, RAI, ASE-1 and ERCC1 on the risk of basal cell carcinoma among Caucasians after age 50. Cancer Detect Prev. 2005;29(3):209–214[Epub 2005, Apr 22]. | CrossRef

35. 35Lear JT, Smith AG. Basal cell carcinoma. Postgrad Med J. 1997;73:538–542. MEDLINE | CrossRef

36. 36Karger B, Zweihoff RF, DuChesne A. Injuries from hand grenades in civilian settings. Int J Legal Med. 1999;112:372–375. MEDLINE | CrossRef

37. 37Bowyer GW, Cooper GJ, Rice P. Small fragment wounds: biophysics and pathophysiology. J Trauma. 1996;40:S159–S164. MEDLINE

38. 38Symonds RP, Mackay C, Morley P. The late effect of grenade fragments. JR Army Med Corps. 1985;131:68–69.

39. 39Lee JH, Kim DG. Brain abscess related to metal fragments 47 years after head injury. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2000 Sep;93(3):477–479. MEDLINE | CrossRef

40. 40Mitchell R, Kerr R, Barton J, et al. Biliary obstruction secondary to shrapnel. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:1531–1534. MEDLINE

41. 41Blumes R. Gefahrenpotential von Explosivstoffen, Begleitmaterialen und Folgeprodukten. In:  Chemie Bildungsserver für editors. Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Forschungs- und Technologietransfers in der Universität Bielefeld e. V. 2003;Available from: http://dc2.uni-bielefeld.de/dc2/kampfst/folien/f-gefpot.htm[accessed 01/30/2006].

42. 42Ozturk S, Bayram Y, Mohur H, et al. Evaluation of late functional results of patients treated with free muscle flaps for heel defects caused by landmine explosions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Dec;116(7):1926–1936.

a Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland

b Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital, 4005 Basel, Switzerland

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41 61 265 2525; fax: +41 61 265 7301.

PII: S1748-6815(06)00451-7

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2006.05.018


View previous. 10 of 23 View next.