Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 60, Issue 2 , Pages 195-200, February 2007

Small incision subperiosteal and trans-blepharoplasty forehead and browlift

Corneo Plastic Unit, The Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, RH19 3DZ, UK

Received 15 July 2005; accepted 9 December 2005. published online 24 May 2006.

Summary 

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-endoscopic, small-incision subperiosteal forehead and browlift in patients undergoing associated upper eyelid blepharoplasty.

This is a retrospective, non-comparative case series of 14 consecutive patients in 12 months. Eleven patients underwent bilateral and three unilateral surgery. Unilateral surgery was performed in patients with facial palsy and was augmented with cable suspension.

The technique involves five small scalp incisions to create a single subperiosteal and deep temporal cavity. Superior arcus marginalis release and direct visualisation of the supraorbital nerve was achieved via a trans-blepharoplasty approach.

All patients achieved a desirable browlift and contour. Follow up ranged from 2 to 40 weeks. Minor complications included transient diplopia (1), reduced upper eyelid sensation (1), and brief postoperative bleeding from one of the small incision sites (1).

Small incision and trans-blepharoplasty forehead and browlift is a safe and effective method to achieve a cosmetically desirable browlift in patients that require associated upper eyelid blepharoplasty, using standard oculoplastic equipment without the need for an endoscope.

Keywords: Browlift, Blepharoplasty, Subperiosteal dissection, Non-endoscopic technique

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented in part at the 5th British Oculoplastic Surgery Society Meeting, 15–16 May 2005, Birmingham, UK.There was no financial support.The authors have no proprietary interest in this study.

PII: S1748-6815(06)00271-3

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.042

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 60, Issue 2 , Pages 195-200, February 2007